What Do You Mean by Comprehensive Peace Agreement

6.2. The decisions of the leaders` meeting of the summit of the seven political parties and CPN (Maoists) on 8 November 2006 constitute the most important political basis for long-term peace. 2. Definition: Unless the issue and context mean otherwise, in this Agreement: The recruitment dispute was settled when the Supreme Court dismissed a complaint challenging the way in which recruitment into the Nepal Army was handled.1 Nevertheless, there were other issues, including how to deal with the YCL, whether or not the confiscated property should be returned, and how best to restore peace and democracy. can be produced. remain controversial. Explanation: For the purposes of this Constitution, «political consensus» means the political consensus reached among the seven members of the Nepalese Congress: NCPN (UML), Nepali Congress (Democratic), Janamorcha Nepal, Nepal Sadbhawana Party (Anandidevi), Nepal Majdur Kisan Party, Samyukta Bam Morcha Nepal and NCP (Maoist) on 22 Kartik 2063 (8 November 2006). Integration had to be done on an individual basis, which was contrary to what the Maoist leader had promised the PLA fighters: group entry into the Nepal Army, rank considerations based on the current level of education of the fighters, and high-ranking positions in plagu commanders. Internal divisions within the party and discontent among the fighters posed a threat to the safety of PLA commanders in the cantons. The Maoist party leader made the dramatic decision that the Nepal Army should take control of neighborhoods, fighters and weapons containers. A day later, all neighborhoods and weapons came under the control of the Nepal Army.4 This development, which was perceived by many in the neighborhoods as a betrayal, led to a sharp decline in the number of those who wanted to be part of the government army.

The number of combatants seeking integration increased from 9,705 in the initial regroupment process to 3,194.5 Declaration of the beginning of a new chapter of peaceful cooperation by ending the armed struggle that continued in the country from 2052, BS by political consensus between the two parties to ensure the sovereignty of the Nepalese people through a constituent assembly, forward-looking political solution, democratic restructuring of the State and economic, social and cultural change; On 25 June 2008, the main political parties agreed to amend the Constitution to advance the peace process. Accordingly, the Constitution was amended on 13 July 20081. The parties agreed to form a special all-party committee within 15 days. However, the formation of the committee was delayed and approved on September 28. October 2008.2 In the agreement, the parties came to the conclusion that «verified combatants would have the choice between possible integration into the security organs `after meeting the standard requirements` and an economic package and other alternatives for rehabilitation». 3 Immediately after the formation of the Special Committee, however, progress fell into a stalemate due to controversy over the parameters of the Committee`s functions and composition.4 The democratization of the NA also remained a controversial issue. UNMIN confirmed that 19,602 former combatants met the criteria for reintegration. 8,640 veterans were not available for review. Of the fighters initially registered, 4,008 were disqualified. Of these disqualified combatants, 1,035 were recruited after the signing of the ceasefire code on 26 May 2006. 2,973 Maoist combatants were under the age of eighteen at the time the ceasefire code was signed.1 According to the report, disqualified combatants received allowances. However, their planned dismissal or demobilization did not take place due to the political uncertainty surrounding the formation of a government after the Constituent Assembly elections.2 The disqualified combatants were not formally expelled from the cantons in 2008.

(a) «ceasefire» means acts of nullification of all forms of aggression, abduction, enforced disappearance, mutual detention and between the Government of Nepal and the CPC (Maoists), mobilization and strengthening of the armed forces, destruction of society by all means, including aggression and violence, and incitement and incitement. A common mechanism was used to amend the Transitional Constitution three times in 2007 (the First Amendment on 13 April 2007, the Second Amendment on 13 June 2007 and the Third Amendment on 28 December 2007). These constitutional amendments included provisions on the impeachment of the prime minister and the king. The provisions provided that a two-thirds majority of the interim legislature could remove the Prime Minister and the King if they constituted an obstacle to elections to the Constituent Assembly. [fn]»Report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council», United Nations (S/2007/235), 26 April 2007. [/efn_note] The third amendment guaranteed that Nepal would become a republic; This change was implemented at the first HQ meeting. [fn]»Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2007, as amended by the First, Second and Third Amendments», UNDP, Nepal. [/efn_note] Both sides agreed on the creation of these amendments. Of these three amendments, the third dealt with the Maoists` demand to declare the country a republic and to apply a PR electoral system in the upcoming elections. The Maoists withdrew from the government to respond to these demands.

This was the second time the elections had been postponed. Finally, the parties reached a 23-point agreement on 23 December. In the agreement, the parties agreed to distribute PR and direct election seats along a line of 60 to 40 percent. They also agreed to hold elections before mid-April 2008 and to make Nepal a republican state. These amendments were adopted in the Third Amendment to the Transitional Constitution on 28 December 2007. «Report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council», United Nations (S/2008/5), 3 January 2008. [/efn_note] After the conclusion of this agreement, the Maoists decided to join the government on 30 December 2007. [fn] Ibid.[/efn_note] In the peace agreement, both sides agreed to restructure the state to end structural discrimination based on caste and ethnicity. .